Junta de Apelaciones de Zonificación – 29 ene 2026

Dónde
No aparece en el Centro de Agendas de la ciudad
Hora
No indicada

Qué se decidió

The Zoning Board of Appeals heard ten cases, approving several projects with conditions, continuing a few for more information, and denying a permit at 50-52 Bodwell Street after a motion to continue failed. One case at 327 High Street was withdrawn by the applicant.

Decisiones registradas

Este resumen aparece en inglés: su traducción automática no pasó nuestras revisiones.

Resumen escrito con inteligencia artificial (IA) a partir de las actas de la ciudad (se abre en una pestaña nueva). Verificado con una transcripción hecha con IA. Las dos vienen de la IA, así que pueden tener el mismo error. Revise el original antes de basarse en él. Cómo se verifican los resúmenes

Informar un error en este resumen
Leer las actas completas

Transcrito con IA a partir del PDF de la ciudad. Revise el original antes de basarse en él.

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

Vice Chair Frederick Diaz

Voting Members Michael Abesamra Sadie Perdomo Erwin Mata

Associate Voting Member Vacant

Chair Richard Rivera

Revised

LAWRENCE MASSACHUSETTS

Land Use Planner Jeannie Aguiler

Comprehensive Planner Reniel Fanini

Planning Director Daniel A. McCarthy

Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting Minutes

Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting Minutes Call to Order: 6:00 P.M., Thursday, January 29th, 2026 Members Present: Chairman Richard Rivera, Vice Chairman Frederick Diaz Voting Members: Michael Abesamra, Erwin Mata Absent: Sadie Perdomo Also Present: Land Use Planner Jeannie Aguiler, Comprehensive Planner Reniel Fanini, Roll call: The Chairman conducted a roll call to record attendance and explained the meeting procedure to the public.

Case 1: 132-134 S. Broadway Summary: The applicant requested a continuance.

Board Discussion/Conditions: - An easement must be formally recorded with the abutting property. Motion: Frederick Diaz motioned to continue, seconded by Erwin Mata. Vote: 4-0 Richard Rivera: Yes | Frederick Diaz: Yes | Michael Abesamra: Yes | Erwin Mata: Yes | Sadie Perdomo: Absent Decision: Continued.

Case 2: 5B Stevens Summary: Miguel Aguilo presented the project for a single-family home. The stated hardship is the limited size of the land, as the project is missing 2 feet of the dimensional requirements. The Chairman inquired about a previous approval; the applicant explained that was circa 2023 and confirmed that the changes requested by the board in the previous meeting had been made.

Board Discussion/Conditions: -

  • Installation of pull-down stairs for the attic to lower it and prevent livable space.
  • Submission of landscaping plans.
  • Motion: Motion to approve with conditions. Vote: 4-0 Richard Rivera: Yes | Frederick Diaz: Yes | Michael Abesamra: Yes | Erwin Mata: Yes | Sadie Perdomo: Absent Decision: Passed with 2 conditions.

Case 3: 12 Saratoga Street Summary: Amauris Ovalles presented the case, which meets all parking requirements. The project was scaled down from three 2-bedroom units to three 1-bedroom units, providing 10 parking spots and a community laundry area in the basement.

Board Discussion/Conditions: - Submission of landscaping plans.

  • Submission of a formal refuse plan.
  • Submission of a formal snow storage plan.
  • Motion: Motion to approve with conditions. Vote: 4-0 Richard Rivera: Yes | Frederick Diaz: Yes | Michael Abesamra: Yes | Erwin Mata: Yes | Sadie Perdomo: Absent Decision: Passed with 3 conditions.

Case 4: 327 High Street Summary: The petition was brought forward for withdrawal by the applicant.

Board Discussion/Conditions: - None recorded.

Motion: Frederick Diaz motioned to withdraw without prejudice, seconded by Michael Abesamra. Vote: 4-0 Richard Rivera: Yes | Frederick Diaz: Yes | Michael Abesamra: Yes | Erwin Mata: Yes | Sadie Perdomo: Absent Decision: Withdrawn without prejudice.

Case 5: 11 Tewksbury Street Summary: The applicant requested a continuance.

Board Discussion/Conditions: - None recorded.

  • Motion: Frederick Diaz motioned to continue, seconded by Erwin Mata. Vote: 4-0 Richard Rivera: Yes | Frederick Diaz: Yes | Michael Abesamra: Yes | Erwin Mata: Yes | Sadie Perdomo: Absent Decision: Continued.

Case 6: 50-52 Bodwell Street Summary: Applicant Jose Estrella sought a permit to build a second ADU. Pedro Conconoto was present to translate. The application was missing crucial documents regarding previous construction.

Board Discussion/Conditions: - The Board requires clarity on the legal construction of the garage.

  • The applicant must provide all proper paperwork detailing how previous construction was approved.
  • The Inspectional Services Department (ISD) and Fire Department licenses/permits need to be reviewed. Motion: Erwin Mata motioned to continue, seconded by Frederick Diaz. The motion to continue failed, resulting in a denial. Vote: 2-2 Richard Rivera: No | Frederick Diaz: Yes | Michael Abesamra: No | Erwin Mata: Yes | Sadie Perdomo: Absent Decision: Denied.

Case 7: 76-78 Bennington Street Summary: Attorney Corrigan and owner Janet Minaya presented the project, which had a previously denied application. The applicant presented a letter of support from the closest neighboring establishment and stated hours of operation would be until 9:00 P.M. During the public hearing, a representative for Annie Haffners spoke against the project, while City Councilor Greg del Rosario spoke in favor. Later in the meeting, Chairman Rivera stated he reconsidered his previous stance to a "yes" vote to support the business. Board Discussion/Conditions: - None recorded. Motion: Frederick Diaz motioned to approve, seconded by Erwin Mata. Vote: 4-0 Richard Rivera: Yes | Frederick Diaz: Yes | Michael Abesamra: Yes | Erwin Mata: Yes | Sadie Perdomo: Absent Decision: Passed.

Case 8: 49 Blanchard Street Summary: Representative Michael Rigeor presented the project, noting that an environmental survey had been completed. A current tenant at 49 Blanchard St spoke in opposition during the public hearing. Board Discussion/Conditions: - Everything must be fenced and privatized from the rails.

  • Submission of Landscaping Plans.
  • Submission of Lighting Plans.
  • Installation of a security camera is strictly required.
  • The reduction in green space to increase parking is being accommodated by tandem parking. Motion: Motion to approve with conditions. Vote: 4-0 Richard Rivera: Yes | Frederick Diaz: Yes | Michael Abesamra: Yes | Erwin Mata: Yes | Sadie Perdomo: Absent Decision: Passed with 4 conditions.

Case 9: 326 Lowell Street Summary: Attorney Corrigan presented the project to the board members. Board Discussion/Conditions: - Submission of a formal Refuse Plan. Motion: Frederick Diaz motioned to approve with one condition. Vote: 4-0 Richard Rivera: Yes | Frederick Diaz: Yes | Michael Abesamra: Yes | Erwin Mata: Yes | Sadie Perdomo: Absent Decision: Passed with 1 condition.

Case 10: 12 Hampshire Street Summary: The petition was reviewed by the Board. Board Discussion/Conditions: - The case was continued at the explicit request of the Chair so that the applicant could provide the necessary building permits. Motion: Erwin Mata motioned to continue, seconded by Michael Abesamra. Vote: 4-0 Richard Rivera: Yes | Frederick Diaz: Yes | Michael Abesamra: Yes | Erwin Mata: Yes | Sadie Perdomo: Absent Decision: Continued.

Additional Business and Adjournment A motion to adjourn was made by Frederick Diaz and seconded. The meeting was officially adjourned

Signed:

[signature] Richard Rivera, Chair

[signature] Michael Abesamra, Voting Member

[signature] Frederick Diaz, Vice-Chairperson

[signature] Erwin Mata, Voting Member

Actas publicadas en el sitio web de la ciudad (PDF, 113 KB, en inglés). Copia guardada (se abre en una pestaña nueva), guardada el .

Agenda

No se guardó aquí una copia de la agenda. Está en el sitio web de la ciudad (se abre en una pestaña nueva).

Fuente

La agenda de esta reunión en el Centro de Agendas de la Ciudad de Lawrence (se abre en una pestaña nueva). Lawrence Publick la registró por primera vez el .